Saturday, April 25, 2009
PERSPECTIVES
Sunday, April 19, 2009
NOT ALWAYS RIGHT
Saturday, April 18, 2009
ON ROMEO

If you look up 'Romeo' in the dictionary, they're won't be a picture of Leonard Whiting there. But you'll get the origin, and you'll get some other nifty stuff too. Romeo: 1 - The hero of Shakespeare's romatic tragedy Romeo and Juliet. 2 - A code word representing the letter R, used in radio communication. 3 - An attractive, passionate male seducer or lover.
Something here seams wrong to me. The first I can account for as being completely true, as a student of English Literature and a lover in general of all things Shakespearean. The second I have no idea about. But the third? When did Romeo become cognates with the words ladies man, womanizer, playboy, babe magnet, stud? Is that you, fair Romeo?
Now, if you read Romeo and Juliet, it is mentioned briefly an ity-bity part about someone named Rosaline. For those of you who don't speak old english, I'll translate it for you.
- You look like you've been up all night.
- I was
- Were you courting (for lack of a better word) Rosaline?
- Rosaline?! How could I be with Rosaline when I've fallen in love with the best gal around. We're getting hitched, Julie and I.
And this is the point in which he starts telling the father about how he has fallen in love with Juliet, and how he would like to marry her. In fact he asks the father to MARRY them that afternoon. If he were a - just like Britney's sayin bouts K-Fed - womanizer, he would not be so keen on marrying here.
Okay, so it blows for Rosaline who may or may not have had her little heart broken. But we need to look at the bigger picture here.
If Romeo was such a playboy or a ladies man, we would have the feeling that he had a million other girls he liked before Juliet and before Rosaline. Women would have been fawning over him at the party in which he fell for Juliet, which is not the case. He is portrayed as a very awkward youth standing around and waiting for something - ANYTHING to happen. Further more when fair Tybalt is annoying Lord Capulet about the removal of Romeo, Lord C even states that Romeo is a 'virtuous youth' and he would not 'for all my wealth remove him from this house'. Now, would those words be reserved for Casanova?
I know this isn't super scholarly because I don't really have all my sources with me at the moment, but I think I would actually like to do some hardcore scholarly writing on this. I wanna know why Romeo now means heartthrob, and why so many people seem to have forgotten about who Romeo really was (you know, half of the whole star-crossed lover thing).
I'd also like to know if the people who really think Romeo was the seducer he was actually read Romeo and Juliet?
The english language and the stupidity of the masses piss me off. Someone as talented as Shakespeare and something as beautiful as Romeo and Juliet only comes across once in a language. Can we just not fuck up that beauty and stand back to appreciate it?
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Friday, April 3, 2009
WTF?

Thursday, April 2, 2009
I'M IN LOVE
